The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 24.8 to 10.8. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.8 to 10.8, ranking #151 overall.

In the 40 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins 40; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.8 and ranks #151 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 40 of 40 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.8
#151
10.8
#251
22.7
#160
8.4
#263
13.1
#89
2.8
#154
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
40 of 40
0 of 40
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$1.49 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
262,144
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

6 shared
Index
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
24.1#116
8.2#253
18.6#75
7.7#137
15.5#37
5.2#87
21.2#62
9.3#119
26.4#48
9.6#143
1 more shared indexes
27.4#27
8.6#132
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

50 reported for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct · 45 for Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

40 shared

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct outperforms in 40 benchmarks (AI2D, AIME 2025, BFCL-v3, BLINK, CC-OCR, CharadesSTA, CharXiv-R, DocVQAtest, ERQA, Hallusion Bench, HMMT25, IFEval, Include, InfoVQAtest, LiveBench 20241125, LiveCodeBench v6, LVBench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMBench-V1.1, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, MMLU-Redux, MM-MT-Bench, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MuirBench, OCRBench, OCRBench-V2 (en), OCRBench-V2 (zh), ODinW, OSWorld, RealWorldQA, ScreenSpot, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, SuperGPQA, VideoMMMU, WritingBench), while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($1.49/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.49
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

232.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has 232.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct, making it 5800.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
236.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
4.0Bparameters
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
4.0B
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-09-22.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.49/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 24.8 to 10.8. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 94.0%, OCRBench: 88.1%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.1%, AI2D: 84.1%.

Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.49/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.8 vs 10.8), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.