Model Comparison

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct outperforms in 16 benchmarks (Arena-Hard v2, BLINK, CC-OCR, CharadesSTA, Creative Writing v3, IFEval, LVBench, MLVU-M, MM-MT-Bench, MVBench, OCRBench, OCRBench-V2 (en), ODinW, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, Video-MME), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 32 benchmarks (AI2D, AIME 2025, BFCL-v3, CharXiv-D, CharXiv-R, ERQA, GPQA, Hallusion Bench, HMMT25, Include, InfoVQAtest, LiveBench 20241125, LiveCodeBench v6, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMBench-V1.1, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, MMLU-Redux, MMMU-Pro, MMMU (val), MMStar, MuirBench, Multi-IF, OCRBench-V2 (zh), OSWorld, PolyMATH, RealWorldQA, SuperGPQA, VideoMMMU, WritingBench). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 34 of 50 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

50 benchmarks

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct outperforms in 16 benchmarks (Arena-Hard v2, BLINK, CC-OCR, CharadesSTA, Creative Writing v3, IFEval, LVBench, MLVU-M, MM-MT-Bench, MVBench, OCRBench, OCRBench-V2 (en), ODinW, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, Video-MME), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 32 benchmarks (AI2D, AIME 2025, BFCL-v3, CharXiv-D, CharXiv-R, ERQA, GPQA, Hallusion Bench, HMMT25, Include, InfoVQAtest, LiveBench 20241125, LiveCodeBench v6, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMBench-V1.1, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, MMLU-Redux, MMMU-Pro, MMMU (val), MMStar, MuirBench, Multi-IF, OCRBench-V2 (zh), OSWorld, PolyMATH, RealWorldQA, SuperGPQA, VideoMMMU, WritingBench).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.70
Best providerNovita
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.99
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 0.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, making it 0.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 32,768 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-09-22.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive output tokens
Higher Arena-Hard v2 score (58.5% vs 56.7%)
Higher BLINK score (67.7% vs 65.4%)
Higher CC-OCR score (80.7% vs 77.8%)
Higher CharadesSTA score (63.5% vs 62.7%)
Higher Creative Writing v3 score (84.6% vs 82.5%)
Higher IFEval score (85.8% vs 81.7%)
Higher LVBench score (62.5% vs 59.2%)
Higher MLVU-M score (81.3% vs 78.9%)
Higher MM-MT-Bench score (8.1% vs 7.9%)
Higher MVBench score (72.3% vs 72.0%)
Higher OCRBench score (90.3% vs 83.9%)
Higher OCRBench-V2 (en) score (63.2% vs 62.6%)
Higher ODinW score (47.5% vs 42.3%)
Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (60.5% vs 57.3%)
Higher SimpleQA score (27.0% vs 23.9%)
Higher Video-MME score (74.5% vs 73.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AI2D score (86.9% vs 85.0%)
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.1% vs 69.3%)
Higher BFCL-v3 score (68.6% vs 66.3%)
Higher CharXiv-D score (86.9% vs 85.5%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (56.6% vs 48.9%)
Higher ERQA score (45.3% vs 43.0%)
Higher GPQA score (74.4% vs 70.4%)
Higher Hallusion Bench score (66.0% vs 61.5%)
Higher HMMT25 score (67.6% vs 50.6%)
Higher Include score (74.5% vs 71.6%)
Higher InfoVQAtest score (86.0% vs 82.0%)
Higher LiveBench 20241125 score (72.1% vs 65.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (64.2% vs 42.6%)
Higher MathVision score (65.7% vs 60.2%)
Higher MathVista-Mini score (81.9% vs 80.1%)
Higher MMBench-V1.1 score (88.9% vs 87.0%)
Higher MMLU score (87.6% vs 85.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.5% vs 77.8%)
Higher MMLU-ProX score (76.1% vs 70.9%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (90.9% vs 88.4%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (63.0% vs 60.4%)
Higher MMMU (val) score (76.0% vs 74.2%)
Higher MMStar score (75.5% vs 72.1%)
Higher MuirBench score (77.6% vs 62.9%)
Higher Multi-IF score (73.0% vs 66.1%)
Higher OCRBench-V2 (zh) score (60.4% vs 57.8%)
Higher OSWorld score (30.6% vs 30.3%)
Higher PolyMATH score (51.7% vs 44.3%)
Higher RealWorldQA score (77.4% vs 73.7%)
Higher SuperGPQA score (56.4% vs 53.1%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (75.0% vs 68.7%)
Higher WritingBench score (85.2% vs 82.6%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Both models cost $0.20 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.