Model Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K3Which is better in 2026?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is 3.2x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

Qwen3.7 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas). Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3.7 Max is roughly 3.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.2x cheaper per token

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas).

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens) is 2.4x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7 Max's 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

1 months ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

1 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together. Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI.

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher GDPval-AA score (55.6% vs 43.6%)
Higher GPQA score (93.5% vs 92.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (56.0% vs 41.4%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (84.2% vs 76.4%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7 Max and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7 Max
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.7 Max compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

Is Qwen3.7 Max cheaper than Kimi K3?

Qwen3.7 Max is 2.4x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7 Max and Kimi K3?

Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.7 Max and Kimi K3?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.25 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.7 Max and Kimi K3?

Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.