Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 4
Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 46.0 to 36.0. Solar Pro 4 is 3.6x cheaper per token.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3.7 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.0 to 36.0, ranking #25 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7 Max wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Solar Pro 4 is roughly 3.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3.7 Max also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Qwen3.7 Max
- overall performance matters — it scores 46.0 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
Choose Solar Pro 4
- cost matters — it's about 3.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
42 reported for Qwen3.7 Max · 9 for Solar Pro 4
Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3.7 Max accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Solar Pro 4 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.
Solar Pro 4 is 3 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.
May 19, 2026
3 months ago
Aug 6, 2026
3 weeks ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.
Qwen3.7 Max
Solar Pro 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 4.