Model Comparison
Qwen3.7-Plus vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?
Qwen3.7-Plus has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Qwen3.7-Plus is 2.7x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Qwen3.7-Plus vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?
Qwen3.7-Plus (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, SWE-bench Multilingual, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified). Qwen3.7-Plus has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
On price, Qwen3.7-Plus is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Choose Qwen3.7-Plus if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…
- you want predictable pricing at $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, SWE-bench Multilingual, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified).
Qwen3.7-Plus has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7-Plus can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.
Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3.7-Plus
MiMo-V2-Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.
Qwen3.7-Plus is 2 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.
May 31, 2026
1 months ago
2mo newerMar 18, 2026
4 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.
Qwen3.7-Plus
MiMo-V2-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.7-Plus
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
MiMo-V2-Pro
View detailsXiaomi
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7-Plus and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3.7-Plus vs MiMo-V2-Pro.