Model Comparison

Qwen3.7-Plus vs MiMo-V2.5-ProWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 1.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3.7-Plus vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro — which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 7 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 4 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, Finance Agent v2, GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified). Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

11 benchmarks

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 7 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 4 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, Finance Agent v2, GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7-Plus is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7-Plus's 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.7-Plus is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.7-Plus is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.

Qwen3.7-Plus is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7-Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (90.3% vs 66.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (34.7% vs 34.0%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (89.6% vs 39.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (88.5% vs 68.5%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (94.5% vs 92.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (57.6% vs 57.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (70.3% vs 68.4%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher Claw-Eval score (64.0% vs 62.7%)
Higher Finance Agent v2 score (41.5% vs 38.2%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (42.9% vs 31.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.9% vs 77.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7-Plus and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7-Plus
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7-Plus vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which is better, Qwen3.7-Plus or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.7-Plus compare to MiMo-V2.5-Pro in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%.

Is Qwen3.7-Plus cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Qwen3.7-Plus is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7-Plus and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.7-Plus and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.32 vs $0.43/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.7-Plus and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons