The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 vs Sarvam-105B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched at 28.0 and 25.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 28.0 and 25.7.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 8 exact shared results

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
28.0
#143
25.7
#162
28.4
#136
26.1
#156
11.4
#116
5.5
#153
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
6 of 8
2 of 8
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Sarvam-105B
31.3#71
29.1#90
33.1#11
26.4#45
33.2#11
26.4#34
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

25 reported for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 · 14 for Sarvam-105B

8 shared

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (Arena-Hard v2, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFEval, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro), while Sarvam-105B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, HMMT25).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Oct 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

130.0B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 has 130.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 123.8% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
235.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-105B is 7 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

7 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 or Sarvam-105B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 28.0 and 25.7. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (28.0 vs 25.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Sarvam-105B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.