The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Sarvam-105B vs Seed 2.0 Mini

Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini are closely matched at 25.2 and 27.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Sarvam AI · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 25.2 and 27.8.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-105B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Seed 2.0 Mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Seed 2.0 Mini
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.2
#181
27.8
#159
Reasoning
25.7
#174
28.7
#148
Coding
-2.2
#273
1.5
#254
Agents
5.1
#170
1.1
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 5
2 of 5
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Sarvam-105B
Seed 2.0 Mini
Math
28.9#96
26.4#111
Finance
26.4#45
26.3#48
Legal
26.4#34
26.3#37
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Sarvam-105B · 83 for Seed 2.0 Mini

5 shared

Sarvam-105B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Beyond AIME, LiveCodeBench v6), while Seed 2.0 Mini is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Sarvam-105B has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Seed 2.0 Mini specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Seed 2.0 Mini specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Mini
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Seed 2.0 Mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Seed 2.0 Mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Sarvam-105B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Seed 2.0 Mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Seed 2.0 Mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06, while Seed 2.0 Mini was released on 2026-02-17.

Sarvam-105B is 1 month newer than Seed 2.0 Mini.

Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

7 months ago

2w newer
Seed 2.0 Mini

Feb 17, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Sarvam-105B
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Sarvam-105B vs Seed 2.0 Mini.

Which is better, Sarvam-105B or Seed 2.0 Mini?

Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 25.2 and 27.8. Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI and Seed 2.0 Mini is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Sarvam-105B compare to Seed 2.0 Mini in benchmarks?

Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%. Seed 2.0 Mini scores CountBench: 95.5%, VLMsAreBlind: 93.1%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 93.0%, CharXiv-D: 91.9%, LongFact Concepts: 91.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini?

Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens and Seed 2.0 Mini supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.2 vs 27.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Sarvam-105B and Seed 2.0 Mini?

Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI and Seed 2.0 Mini is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons