Finance Agent v2
Finance Agent v2 is an agentic financial-analysis benchmark from Vals that evaluates models on real-world finance workflows, measuring their ability to retrieve and reason over financial documents, perform multi-step calculations, and produce accurate analyses.
Gemini 3.5 Flash from Google currently leads the Finance Agent v2 leaderboard with a score of 0.579 across 25 evaluated AI models.
What Finance Agent v2 measures
Finance Agent v2 is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on reasoning, finance, and agents tasks. LLM Stats tracks 25 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.4, with the leader reaching 0.6.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for finance and best AI for agents leaderboards.
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads with 57.9%, followed by 
Claude Fable 5 at 56.3% and Claude Opus 4.8 at 53.9%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Finance Agent v2
Finance Agent v2 Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google | — | 1.0M | $1.50 / $9.00 | ||
| 2 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 4 |  OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $5.00 / $30.00 | ||
| 5 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 6 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 7 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $1.25 / $3.75 | ||
| 8 |  MiniMax | — | 1.0M | $0.60 / $2.40 | ||
| 9 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $0.75 / $4.50 | ||
| 10 |  Moonshot AI | 1.0T | 262K | $0.95 / $4.00 | ||
| 11 |  Zhipu AI | 754B | 200K | $1.40 / $4.40 | ||
| 12 | Google | — | 1.0M | $2.50 / $15.00 | ||
| 13 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 14 |  Xiaomi | 1.0T | 1.0M | $0.43 / $0.87 | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 16 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $0.20 / $1.25 | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | — | — | ||
| 18 |  xAI | — | 1.0M | $1.25 / $2.50 | ||
| 19 | 550B | — | — | |||
| 20 | Xiaomi | 311B | 1.0M | $0.17 / $0.34 | ||
| 21 |  Mistral AI | 128B | 256K | $1.50 / $7.50 | ||
| 22 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $1.00 / $5.00 | ||
| 23 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.25 / $1.50 | ||
| 24 | — | — | — | |||
| 25 | MiniMax | — | 205K | $0.30 / $1.20 |
FAQ
Common questions about Finance Agent v2.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions