WritingBench
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on WritingBench
WritingBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 80B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 80B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 15 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — |
What is WritingBench?
A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' generative writing capabilities across 6 core writing domains (Academic & Engineering, Finance & Business, Politics & Law, Literature & Art, Education, Advertising & Marketing) and 100 subdomains. Contains 1,239 queries with a query-dependent evaluation framework that dynamically generates 5 instance-specific assessment criteria for each writing task, using a fine-tuned critic model to score responses on style, format, and length dimensions.
WritingBench is a text benchmark evaluating models on legal, finance, communication, creativity, and writing tasks. LLM Stats tracks 15 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for legal, best AI for finance, best AI for communication, best AI for creativity and best AI for writing leaderboards.
Current leaders
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the WritingBench leaderboard with a score of 0.883 across 15 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- WritingBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Generative Writing
- Authors
- Yuning Wu, Jiahao Mei, Ming Yan, Chenliang Li, and 7 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2503.05244
Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced text generation capabilities, yet evaluating their performance in generative writing remains a challenge. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on generic text generation or limited in writing tasks, failing to capture the diverse requirements of high-quality written contents across various domains. To bridge this gap, we present WritingBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs across 6 core writing domains and 100 subdomains. We further propose a query-dependent evaluation framework that empowers LLMs to dynamically generate instance-specific assessment criteria. This framework is complemented by a fine-tuned critic model for criteria-aware scoring, enabling evaluations in style, format and length. The framework's validity is further demonstrated by its data curation capability, which enables a 7B-parameter model to outperform the performance of GPT-4o in writing. We open-source the benchmark, along with evaluation tools and modular framework components, to advance the development of LLMs in writing.
FAQ
Common questions about the WritingBench benchmark and leaderboard.