The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Command A+

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 24.0.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 24.0, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Command A+

  • you are already invested in the Cohere ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.3
#10
24.0
#168
50.5
#12
21.5
#179
36.2
#22
7.3
#185
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 15 for Command A+

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Command A+don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

526.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 526.0B more parameters than Command A+, making it 241.3% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
218.0B
Command A+

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Command A+ supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Command A+ can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Command A+ uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20.

Atria Dawn Preview is 4 months newer than Command A+.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
Command A+

May 20, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Command A+ side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Command A+
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Command A+.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Command A+?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 24.0. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Command A+ is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Command A+ in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Command A+?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 24.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Command A+?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Command A+ is developed by Cohere.