The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -4.5.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -4.5, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
-4.5
#338
Coding
35.6
#25
-0.0
#233
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$40.00 / M
Context window
—
32,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 18 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructeddon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

1.2yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -4.5. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs -4.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons