The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Gemma 4 E4B

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 13.8.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 13.8, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 4 E4B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.02/M input and $0.10/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Gemma 4 E4B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
13.8
#241
Reasoning
50.5
#12
13.6
#234
Agents
38.8
#10
1.8
#167
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 11 for Gemma 4 E4B

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 4 E4Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

736.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 736.0B more parameters than Gemma 4 E4B, making it 9200.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 4 E4B
8.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
8.0B
Gemma 4 E4B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 4 E4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 4 E4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 4 E4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 4 E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Gemma 4 E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 4 E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 4 E4B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 4 E4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Gemma 4 E4B was released on 2026-04-02.

Atria Dawn Preview is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 E4B.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer
Gemma 4 E4B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date.

Atria Dawn Preview

—

Gemma 4 E4B

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 4 E4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Gemma 4 E4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Gemma 4 E4B.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Gemma 4 E4B?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 13.8. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Gemma 4 E4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Gemma 4 E4B in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Gemma 4 E4B scores MMMLU: 76.6%, MMLU-Pro: 69.4%, MathVision: 59.5%, GPQA: 58.6%, t2-bench: 57.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 4 E4B?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 4 E4B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 4 E4B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 13.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 4 E4B?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Gemma 4 E4B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons