The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 8.4.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 8.4, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
8.4
#278
Reasoning
50.5
#12
7.9
#279
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 15 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

720.4B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 720.4B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct, making it 3052.5% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
23.6Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
23.6B
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20.

Atria Dawn Preview is 15 months newer than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

5 days ago

1.2yr newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date.

Atria Dawn Preview

—

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 8.4. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 8.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons