The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen3-Coder

Comparing Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coder across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coder trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-Coder

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.18/M input and $0.18/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
256,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 0 for Qwen3-Coder

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

264.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 264.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Coder, making it 55.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
480.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Coder specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3-Coder specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3-Coder uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3-Coder

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Qwen3-Coder was released on 2025-01-01.

Atria Dawn Preview is 21 months newer than Qwen3-Coder.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

5 days ago

1.7yr newer
Qwen3-Coder

Jan 1, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen3-Coder.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Qwen3-Coder?

Atria Dawn Preview (Shanghai AI Laboratory) and Qwen3-Coder (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Qwen3-Coder in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coder?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Coder supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coder?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Coder?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen3-Coder is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.