The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3-Coder

Comparing Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coder across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coder trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-Coder

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Qwen3-Coder
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 0 for Qwen3-Coder

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Coder specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3-Coder specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen3-Coder was released on 2025-01-01.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 20 months newer than Qwen3-Coder.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

1.7yr newer
Qwen3-Coder

Jan 1, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3-Coder.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen3-Coder?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber (Google) and Qwen3-Coder (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen3-Coder in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coder?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Coder supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coder?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3-Coder?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen3-Coder is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons