The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 45.5.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 45.5, ranking #10 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
45.5
#29
Reasoning
50.5
#12
46.2
#27
Coding
36.2
#22
36.1
#24
Agents
38.8
#10
29.2
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
Qwen3.7 Max
Tool use
31.1#12
26.9#26
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

3 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BFCL-V4, SkillsBench), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Pro).

Atria Dawn Preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7 Max specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7 Max specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.7 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Atria Dawn Preview is 4 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

4 days ago

3mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 45.5. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3.7 Max?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 45.5), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3.7 Max?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons