Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.7 Max

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched at 43.3 and 45.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 20.8x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.3 and 45.6.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 20.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7 Max also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

cost matters — it's about 20.8x cheaper per token
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

InclusionAI

Qwen3.7 Max

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

43.3

#39 · 5 evals

45.6

#26 · 37 evals

Best

Reasoning

44.7

#32 · 4 evals

46.2

#25 · 24 evals

Best

Agents

29.5

#35 · 5 evals

Best

29.3

#36 · 13 evals

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

1 of 2

Input price

$0.06 / M

Best

$1.25 / M

Output price

$0.18 / M

Best

$3.75 / M

Context window

262,144

1,000,000

Best

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared

Index

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Qwen3.7 Max

Tool use

20.5#56 · 2 evals

27.5#22 · 5 evals

Finance

36.7#5 · 2 evals

41.1#1 · 4 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

2 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 1 benchmark (SpreadSheetBench-v1).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 20.8x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 20.8x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Input tokens$0.06

Output tokens$0.18

Best providerDeepinfra

Qwen3.7 Max

Input tokens$1.25

Output tokens$3.75

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7 Max accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 4 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

5 days ago

3mo newer

Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, Together.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

Novita

Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

✓ Preferred

Qwen3.7 Max

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Qwen3.7 Max?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.3 and 45.6. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 20.8x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.3 vs 45.6), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.06 vs $1.25/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3.7 Max?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.7 Max