Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash are closely matched at 44.6 and 47.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Beam 1.0 is 2.5x cheaper per token.

Reflection AI · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 47.6.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.7 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Beam 1.0 is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Beam 1.0

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

44.6

#46 · 22 evals

47.6

#34 · 17 evals

Best

Reasoning

45.5

#37 · 19 evals

Best

45.4

#38 · 12 evals

Coding

33.7

#39 · 9 evals

Best

31.7

#54 · 4 evals

Agents

28.8

#53 · 9 evals

31.6

#39 · 10 evals

Best

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

1 of 3

2 of 3

Best

Input price

$0.40 / M

Best

$0.75 / M

Output price

$1.20 / M

Best

$3.75 / M

Context window

1,048,576

Best

1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared

Index

Beam 1.0

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Vision

15.9#105 · 2 evals

32.1#28 · 4 evals

Tool use

26.4#32 · 4 evals

22.9#51 · 4 evals

Long context

29.5#5 · 2 evals

30.5#4 · 2 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 18 for Gemini 3.7 Flash

3 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AutomationBench), while Gemini 3.7 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Gemini 3.7 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Beam 1.0 costs less

For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than Beam 1.0.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Beam 1.0

Input tokens$0.40

Output tokens$1.20

Best providerTogether

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Input tokens$0.75

Output tokens$3.75

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.7 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Beam 1.0

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output1,000,000 tokens

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.

Gemini 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Beam 1.0

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 3.7 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13.

Beam 1.0 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

2mo newer

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Gemini 3.7 Flash has a cutoff of 2026-03-31.

Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3.7 Flash (2026-03-31).

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

3 mo newer

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

Provider Availability

Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google.

Beam 1.0

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Unknown Organization

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0

✓ Preferred

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 47.6. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Gemini 3.7 Flash in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%.

Is Beam 1.0 cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Beam 1.0 is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. Beam 1.0 costs $0.40/M input and $1.20/M output via together. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 47.6), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.75/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google.

Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash