The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched at 47.5 and 48.5 on the LLM Stats Score. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5.7x cheaper per token.

Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 47.5 and 48.5.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 5.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 5.7x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.5
#34
48.5
#29
Reasoning
45.3
#37
45.8
#34
Coding
31.4
#54
37.8
#23
Agents
31.5
#39
35.6
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 5
3 of 5
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 3.7 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Vision
32.1#28
28.8#42
Tool use
22.6#51
26.8#30
Multimodal
33.1#19
30.2#38
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemini 3.7 Flash · 14 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

5 shared

Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GDP.pdf), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, DeepSWE 1.1, OSWorld 2.0).

MiniMax M3.1 Flash has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerDeepinfra
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is limited to 524,288 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

2 months ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 47.5 and 48.5. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via deepinfra. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.5 vs 48.5), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons