Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 44.6. Beam 1.0 is 6.7x cheaper per token.
Reflection AI · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 44.6, ranking #4 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Argon wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Beam 1.0 is roughly 6.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Beam 1.0
- cost matters — it's about 6.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Gemini 4 Argon
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 19 for Gemini 4 Argon
Beam 1.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 4 Argon is better at 2 benchmarks (AutomationBench, DeepSWE 1.1).
Gemini 4 Argon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 4 Argon is more expensive than Beam 1.0.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 4 Argon supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.
Gemini 4 Argon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Beam 1.0
Gemini 4 Argon
License
Usage and distribution terms
Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 4 Argon uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30.
Beam 1.0 is 1 month newer than Gemini 4 Argon.
Oct 16, 2026
4 days ago
2w newerSep 30, 2026
2 weeks ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google.
Beam 1.0
Gemini 4 Argon
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Gemini 4 Argon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 4 Argon.