The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy are closely matched at 44.6 and 40.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Reflection AI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 40.6.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.6
#46
40.6
#72
45.5
#37
38.9
#74
33.7
#39
17.5
#136
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
Grok-4 Heavy
35.1#45
41.8#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 6 for Grok-4 Heavy

3 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Grok-4 Heavy is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

Beam 1.0 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Beam 1.0 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Beam 1.0 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.

Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Beam 1.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Grok-4 Heavy uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Beam 1.0's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Grok-4 Heavy has a cutoff of 2024-12-31.

Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Grok-4 Heavy (2024-12-31).

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

1.5 yr newer
Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
Grok-4 Heavy
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Grok-4 Heavy.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Grok-4 Heavy?

Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 40.6. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Grok-4 Heavy in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 40.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI.