Beam 1.0 vs Laguna S 2.1
Beam 1.0 and Laguna S 2.1 are closely matched at 44.6 and 39.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Laguna S 2.1 is 4.8x cheaper per token.
Reflection AI · Poolside · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Beam 1.0 and Laguna S 2.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 39.7.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Laguna S 2.1 is roughly 4.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Beam 1.0
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Laguna S 2.1
- cost matters — it's about 4.8x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 6 for Laguna S 2.1
Beam 1.0 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Laguna S 2.1 is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA, SWE-bench Multilingual).
Beam 1.0 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Laguna S 2.1 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Laguna S 2.1 ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Laguna S 2.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Beam 1.0 has 383.3B more parameters than Laguna S 2.1, making it 324.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Beam 1.0 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Laguna S 2.1 uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Laguna S 2.1 was released on 2026-07-21.
Beam 1.0 is 3 months newer than Laguna S 2.1.
Oct 16, 2026
4 days ago
2mo newerJul 21, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Laguna S 2.1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Laguna S 2.1's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Laguna S 2.1 is available from Poolside.
Beam 1.0
Laguna S 2.1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Laguna S 2.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Laguna S 2.1.