The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Laguna S 2.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 39.7 to 29.6.

Poolside · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Laguna S 2.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 39.7 to 29.6, ranking #73 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Laguna S 2.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Laguna S 2.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 39.7 and ranks #73 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Laguna S 2.1
Poolside
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
39.7
#73
29.6
#146
Reasoning
39.7
#71
28.9
#146
Coding
29.1
#69
14.4
#154
Agents
23.3
#75
11.9
#127
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Laguna S 2.1
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Tool use
15.3#106
5.4#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Laguna S 2.1 · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

1 shared

Laguna S 2.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Laguna S 2.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

44.0B diff

Laguna S 2.1 has 44.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 59.5% larger.

Poolside
Laguna S 2.1
118.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
118.0B
Laguna S 2.1
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Laguna S 2.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Poolside
Laguna S 2.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Laguna S 2.1 does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Laguna S 2.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Laguna S 2.1

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Laguna S 2.1 was released on 2026-07-21, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 3 months newer than Laguna S 2.1.

Laguna S 2.1

Jul 21, 2026

3 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Laguna S 2.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Laguna S 2.1's cutoff date.

Laguna S 2.1

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Laguna S 2.1
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Laguna S 2.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 39.7 to 29.6. Laguna S 2.1 is made by Poolside and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Laguna S 2.1 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

Laguna S 2.1 scores SWE-bench Multilingual: 78.5%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 70.2%, SWE-Bench Pro: 59.4%, Toolathlon: 49.7%, SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA: 46.2%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Laguna S 2.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (39.7 vs 29.6), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Laguna S 2.1 is developed by Poolside and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons