Beam 1.0 vs Solar Pro 4
Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 34.7. Solar Pro 4 is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Reflection AI · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 34.7, ranking #46 overall.
In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Solar Pro 4 is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Beam 1.0
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Solar Pro 4
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 9 for Solar Pro 4
Beam 1.0 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AA-LCR, AIME 2026, BrowseComp, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) costs the same as Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Solar Pro 4 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.
Beam 1.0 is 2 months newer than Solar Pro 4.
Oct 16, 2026
3 days ago
2mo newerAug 6, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Solar Pro 4's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Solar Pro 4's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.
Beam 1.0
Solar Pro 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Solar Pro 4.