ChatGPT-4o Latest vs Muse Glimmer-30B
ChatGPT-4o Latest and Muse Glimmer-30B are closely matched at 24.9 and 34.5 on the LLM Stats Score. Muse Glimmer-30B is 8.3x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ChatGPT-4o Latest and Muse Glimmer-30B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.9 and 34.5.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ChatGPT-4o Latest wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Muse Glimmer-30B is roughly 8.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Glimmer-30B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ChatGPT-4o Latest
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
Choose Muse Glimmer-30B
- cost matters — it's about 8.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
1 reported for ChatGPT-4o Latest · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B
ChatGPT-4o Latest outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Muse Glimmer-30B is better at 0 benchmarks.
ChatGPT-4o Latest significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ChatGPT-4o Latest ($2.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, ChatGPT-4o Latest ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, ChatGPT-4o Latest is more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Glimmer-30B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to ChatGPT-4o Latest's 128,000 tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while ChatGPT-4o Latest is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both ChatGPT-4o Latest and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
ChatGPT-4o Latest
Muse Glimmer-30B
License
Usage and distribution terms
ChatGPT-4o Latest is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ChatGPT-4o Latest was released on 2024-05-13, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.
Muse Glimmer-30B is 27 months newer than ChatGPT-4o Latest.
May 13, 2024
2.4 years ago
Aug 10, 2026
1 months ago
2.2yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while ChatGPT-4o Latest's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without ChatGPT-4o Latest's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2026
Provider Availability
ChatGPT-4o Latest is available from OpenAI. Muse Glimmer-30B is available from DeepInfra.
ChatGPT-4o Latest
Muse Glimmer-30B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ChatGPT-4o Latest and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ChatGPT-4o Latest vs Muse Glimmer-30B.