The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-6 Rosalind

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is roughly 18.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • cost matters — it's about 18.8x cheaper per token

Choose GPT-6 Rosalind

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
GPT-6 Rosalind
OpenAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.80 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
$75.00 / M
Context window
200,000
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 0 for GPT-6 Rosalind

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalinddon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 18.8x cheaper than GPT-6 Rosalind ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 18.8x cheaper than GPT-6 Rosalind ($75.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Rosalind is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Rosalind supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

GPT-6 Rosalind can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Rosalind

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while GPT-6 Rosalind was released on 2026-10-30.

GPT-6 Rosalind is 25 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

2.0 years ago

GPT-6 Rosalind

Oct 30, 2026

3 days ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. GPT-6 Rosalind is available from OpenAI.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

GPT-6 Rosalind

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Rosalind
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-6 Rosalind.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Rosalind (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to GPT-6 Rosalind in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 18.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. GPT-6 Rosalind costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GPT-6 Rosalind supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.80 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GPT-6 Rosalind is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons