The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Kimi K2.8 Preview

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Preview across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Preview trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Kimi K2.8 Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 0 for Kimi K2.8 Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Kimi K2.8 Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11.

Kimi K2.8 Preview is 23 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

3 days ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Kimi K2.8 Preview is available from Moonshot AI.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Kimi K2.8 Preview

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Kimi K2.8 Preview.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Kimi K2.8 Preview in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI.