The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Command A+

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+ are closely matched at 23.9 and 24.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+ are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 23.9 and 24.0.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Command A+ wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Command A+

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
23.9
#172
24.0
#171
23.1
#168
21.5
#182
13.6
#139
7.3
#188
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Command A+
16.8#201
24.1#119
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 15 for Command A+

2 shared

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Command A+ is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMMU).

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+ support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Command A+ uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20.

Command A+ is 15 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.6 years ago

Command A+

May 20, 2026

4 months ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+ side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Command A+
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Command A+.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Command A+?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+ are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 23.9 and 24.0. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Command A+ is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Command A+ in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.9 vs 24.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A+?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Command A+ is developed by Cohere.