The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs LongCat-2.5

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 23.5.

Cohere · Meituan · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 23.5, ranking #20 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, LongCat-2.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command A+
Cohere
LongCat-2.5
Meituan
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
23.5
#204
50.0
#20
Reasoning
21.1
#213
48.3
#21
Coding
7.7
#217
38.6
#27
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Command A+
LongCat-2.5
Math
23.6#139
37.2#37
Vision
12.3#124
32.5#29
Multimodal
15.5#106
34.8#15
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 23 for LongCat-2.5

1 shared

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while LongCat-2.5 is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).

LongCat-2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1382.0B diff

LongCat-2.5 has 1382.0B more parameters than Command A+, making it 633.9% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
1.6Tparameters
218.0B
Command A+
1600.0B
LongCat-2.5

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only LongCat-2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only LongCat-2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Command A+ and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.

LongCat-2.5 is 6 months newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

5 months ago

LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

5 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
LongCat-2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs LongCat-2.5.

Which is better, Command A+ or LongCat-2.5?

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 23.5. Command A+ is made by Cohere and LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to LongCat-2.5 in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and LongCat-2.5?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and LongCat-2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.5 vs 50.0), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and LongCat-2.5?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan.

Related comparisons