The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched at 23.7 and 22.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 23.7 and 22.1.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
23.7
#192
22.1
#202
Reasoning
22.8
#188
19.8
#213
Coding
13.4
#157
2.9
#241
Agents
4.8
#172
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
16.7#211
12.2#245
Tool use
17.9#84
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

2 shared

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 20 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.6 years ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 23.7 and 22.1. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.7 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons