The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 22.1.

NVIDIA · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 22.1, ranking #108 overall.

In the 10 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.0 and ranks #108 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 10 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.0
#108
22.1
#202
Reasoning
36.2
#94
19.8
#213
Coding
21.0
#108
2.9
#241
Agents
16.5
#99
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 10
2 of 10
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
28.1#101
12.2#245
Tool use
11.0#133
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

10 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) outperforms in 8 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, OmniScience, SciCode, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 2 benchmarks (AA-LCR, IFBench).

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

116.0B diff

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has 116.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 2900.0% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
120.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
120.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 0 month newer than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

2 days ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

1 days ago

1d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 22.1. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.0 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons