The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs Ember-1

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to -1.5. Claude 3 Haiku is 12.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Fireworks AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.6 to -1.5, ranking #46 overall.

On price, Claude 3 Haiku is roughly 12.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • cost matters — it's about 12.0x cheaper per token

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-1.5
#350
43.6
#46
Reasoning
-1.5
#343
38.6
#70
Coding
0.6
#252
38.0
#20
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
200,000
1,040,000

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 4 for Ember-1

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3 Haiku and Ember-1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 12.0x cheaper than Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.0x cheaper than Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23.

Ember-1 is 31 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.6 years ago

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Ember-1 is available from Fireworks.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Ember-1

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and Ember-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Ember-1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs Ember-1.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Ember-1?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to -1.5. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to Ember-1 in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%.

Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than Ember-1?

Claude 3 Haiku is 12.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. Ember-1 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and Ember-1?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and Ember-1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.5 vs 43.6), context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.25 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and Ember-1?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI.

Related comparisons