Model Comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 4BWhich is better in 2026?
Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is 1200.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 4B — which is better?
Claude 3 Opus (by Anthropic) and Gemma 3 4B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 5 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3 4B is better at 1 benchmark (MATH). Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 1200.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude 3 Opus also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3 Opus if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
Choose Gemma 3 4B if…
- cost matters — it's about 1200.0x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 5 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3 4B is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).
Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 750.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 1875.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude 3 Opus accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemma 3 4B is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3 4B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 3 4B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 4B uses Gemma.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Gemma
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12.
Gemma 3 4B is 13 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Feb 29, 2024
2.3 years ago
Mar 12, 2025
1.3 years ago
1.0yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.
—
Aug 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra.
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 3 4B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Opus
View detailsAnthropic
Gemma 3 4B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 4B.