The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Cyber

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 9.4. Claude 3 Opus is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 9.4, ranking #77 overall.

On price, Claude 3 Opus is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Opus

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #77 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
9.4
#309
41.0
#77
Coding
5.0
#238
33.5
#49
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$15.00 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
$100.00 / M
Context window
200,000
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 1 for GPT-6 Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Opus costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Claude 3 Opus.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Cyber support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05.

GPT-6 Cyber is 33 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.7 years ago

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

3 days ago

2.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI.

Claude 3 Opus

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Opus
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Cyber.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-6 Cyber?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 9.4. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to GPT-6 Cyber in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%.

Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber?

Claude 3 Opus is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Cyber?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.4 vs 41.0), context window (200K vs 1.1M), input pricing ($15.00 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Cyber?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons