The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 12.4 to 1.3. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 44.4x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 12.4 to 1.3, ranking #283 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is roughly 44.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude 3 Sonnet also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Sonnet

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 12.4 and ranks #283 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 44.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.3
#355
12.4
#283
1.2
#346
12.8
#272
-1.5
#281
8.0
#212
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$3.00 / M
$0.12 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
200,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Sonnet
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
7.3#284
15.0#233
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Sonnet · 4 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

1 shared

Claude 3 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 83.3x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Sonnet is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Oct 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Claude 3 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 11 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.7 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.8 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra.

Claude 3 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Which is better, Claude 3 Sonnet or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 12.4 to 1.3. Claude 3 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Sonnet compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Sonnet scores ARC-C: 93.2%, GSM8k: 92.3%, HellaSwag: 89.0%, MGSM: 83.5%, BIG-Bench Hard: 82.9%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet cheaper than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Claude 3 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.3 vs 12.4), context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.12/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Claude 3 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek.