The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 5.4.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 5.4, ranking #5 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.8 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
54.8
#5
5.4
#282
Reasoning
52.1
#7
1.7
#295
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Vision
40.5#1
5.8#146
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Fable 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Fable 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Claude Fable 5.1 is 17 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Claude Fable 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 days ago

1.4yr newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 5.4. Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores OSWorld 2.0: 77.9%, CursorBench v3.2: 73.4%, Humanity's Last Exam: 65.0%, GDPval-AA: 61.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 55.8%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.8 vs 5.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons