The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 25.7.

Anthropic · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 25.7, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.7
#157
40.6
#57
Coding
19.6
#105
34.1
#35
Agents
13.5
#95
29.9
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Claude Haiku 4.5 · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 11 months newer than Claude Haiku 4.5.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

11 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 4.5
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 25.7. Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.7 vs 40.6), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons