The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched at 25.5 and 22.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 25.5 and 22.1.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5

  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.5
#177
22.1
#202
Reasoning
25.1
#175
19.8
#213
Coding
19.5
#118
2.9
#242
Agents
13.3
#114
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 4.5
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
15.6#225
12.2#245
Tool use
15.2#107
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

2 shared

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Claude Haiku 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 12 months newer than Claude Haiku 4.5.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

1.0 years ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 4.5
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 25.5 and 22.1. Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.5 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons