The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1 are closely matched at 49.9 and 44.3 on the LLM Stats Score. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 100.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Anthropic · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 49.9 and 44.3.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Mythos 5.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Claude Haiku 5.5 is roughly 100.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • cost matters — it's about 100.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
49.9
#20
44.3
#50
47.5
#25
43.3
#51
39.2
#15
36.1
#27
33.8
#33
34.1
#28
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
$10.00 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$50.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 1 for Claude Mythos 5.1

1 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Mythos 5.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 4.0).

Claude Mythos 5.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than Claude Mythos 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than Claude Mythos 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.1 is more expensive than Claude Haiku 5.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Mythos 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude Mythos 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Claude Mythos 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1 month newer than Claude Mythos 5.1.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Claude Mythos 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Claude Mythos 5.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Mythos 5.1's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Claude Mythos 5.1

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Claude Mythos 5.1 is available from Anthropic.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Claude Mythos 5.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Claude Mythos 5.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Mythos 5.1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 49.9 and 44.3. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Claude Mythos 5.1 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Claude Mythos 5.1 in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Claude Mythos 5.1 scores Terminal-Bench 4.0: 60.9%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Claude Mythos 5.1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 100.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via anthropic. Claude Mythos 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.9 vs 44.3), input pricing ($0.10 vs $10.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.