Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mercury 2
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 23.5. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1.9x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 23.5, ranking #19 overall.
On price, Claude Haiku 5.5 is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Haiku 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Mercury 2
- you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $0.75/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 6 for Mercury 2
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mercury 2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Mercury 2 ($0.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Mercury 2 ($0.75/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mercury 2 is more expensive than Claude Haiku 5.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Mercury 2's 128,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Mercury 2 is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 2 does not.
Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Mercury 2
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Mercury 2 was released on 2026-02-24.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is 8 months newer than Mercury 2.
Oct 7, 2026
4 days ago
7mo newerFeb 24, 2026
7 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Mercury 2's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mercury 2's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Mercury 2 is available from Inception.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Mercury 2
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mercury 2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mercury 2.