The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Mythos 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 45.1 to 38.3. Claude Opus 4.5 is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Anthropic · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.1 to 38.3, ranking #31 overall.

On price, Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Mythos 5.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.1 and ranks #31 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Claude Opus 4.5

  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.1
#31
38.3
#65
44.4
#34
40.0
#53
37.5
#17
28.4
#55
34.5
#21
17.8
#71
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$10.00 / M
$5.00 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$25.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
200,000

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Claude Mythos 5.1 · 11 for Claude Opus 4.5

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Claude Opus 4.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.1 is more expensive than Claude Opus 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Mythos 5.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Claude Mythos 5.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.1 and Claude Opus 4.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24.

Claude Mythos 5.1 is 9 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 weeks ago

9mo newer
Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Claude Mythos 5.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Mythos 5.1's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Provider Availability

Claude Mythos 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic.

Claude Mythos 5.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.1 and Claude Opus 4.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.1
✓ Preferred
Claude Opus 4.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.5.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Claude Opus 4.5?

Claude Mythos 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 45.1 to 38.3. Claude Mythos 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.1 compare to Claude Opus 4.5 in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.1 scores Terminal-Bench 4.0: 60.9%. Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%.

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5?

Claude Opus 4.5 is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Mythos 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.1 and Claude Opus 4.5?

Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.1 and Claude Opus 4.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.1 vs 38.3), context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $5.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.