The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched at 45.1 and 45.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3.7 Max is 10.7x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.1 and 45.6.

On price, Qwen3.7 Max is roughly 10.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • cost matters — it's about 10.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.1
#31
45.6
#26
44.4
#34
46.2
#25
37.5
#17
36.3
#21
34.5
#21
29.3
#36
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$10.00 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Claude Mythos 5.1 · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Maxdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.1 is more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Mythos 5.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Claude Mythos 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Claude Mythos 5.1 is 4 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Mythos 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, Together.

Claude Mythos 5.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 45.1 and 45.6. Claude Mythos 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.1 compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.1 scores Terminal-Bench 4.0: 60.9%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Mythos 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.1 vs 45.6), input pricing ($10.00 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.