The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Claude Mythos Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 54.9 to 43.0. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 555.6x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.9 to 43.0, ranking #4 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 555.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.9 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 555.6x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos Preview
Anthropic
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
54.9
#4
43.0
#44
Reasoning
55.8
#2
44.2
#35
Agents
36.2
#17
29.2
#37
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$25.00 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$125.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Claude Mythos Preview · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Claude Mythos Preview ($25.00/1M tokens) is 416.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Mythos Preview ($125.00/1M tokens) is 694.4x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos Preview is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Mythos Preview
Input tokens$25.00
Output tokens$125.00
Best providerAnthropic
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Claude Mythos Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Claude Mythos Preview's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Claude Mythos Preview's release date.

Claude Mythos Preview

—

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Mythos Preview is available from Anthropic. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Mythos Preview

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $25.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $125.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos Preview
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Claude Mythos Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Claude Mythos Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 54.9 to 43.0. Claude Mythos Preview is made by Anthropic and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos Preview compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos Preview scores CyBench: 100.0%, USAMO25: 97.6%, GPQA: 94.6%, SWE-Bench Verified: 93.9%, CharXiv-R: 93.2%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Claude Mythos Preview cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 416.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Mythos Preview costs $25.00/M input and $125.00/M output via anthropic. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Claude Mythos Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.9 vs 43.0), input pricing ($25.00 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Claude Mythos Preview is developed by Anthropic and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons