The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 29.9. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 55.2x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 29.9, ranking #19 overall.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is roughly 55.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.1

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 55.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#126
49.8
#19
Reasoning
29.9
#122
45.2
#30
Coding
21.6
#88
41.8
#9
Agents
12.9
#99
37.5
#13
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$15.00 / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
200,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Opus 4.1
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Tool use
18.3#67
28.0#21
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Claude Opus 4.1 · 18 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 34.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 86.2x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.1's 200,000 tokens. Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 14 months newer than Claude Opus 4.1.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Opus 4.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.1
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 29.9. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 34.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 49.8), context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.43/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons