Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are closely matched at 27.7 and 29.8 on the LLM Stats Score. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 35.3x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 27.7 and 29.8.
On price, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 35.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4
- you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- cost matters — it's about 35.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude Opus 4 · 6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Litedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Claude Opus 4 is limited to 32,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 14 months newer than Claude Opus 4.
May 22, 2025
1.3 years ago
Jul 21, 2026
2 months ago
1.2yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Claude Opus 4's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4's cutoff date.
—
Mar 2026
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.
Claude Opus 4
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.