The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 29.9.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 29.9, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#126
40.6
#57
Coding
15.8
#132
34.1
#35
Agents
15.4
#87
29.9
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 29.9. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 40.6), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons