The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 29.9.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 29.9, ranking #29 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#126
45.7
#29
Reasoning
25.9
#151
43.2
#42
Coding
15.8
#132
36.6
#22
Agents
15.4
#87
33.3
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

2 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (OSWorld-Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 29.9. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 45.7), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons