Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 27.4. Gemini 4 Argon is 7.5x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 27.4, ranking #4 overall.
On price, Gemini 4 Argon is roughly 7.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 4 Argon also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4
- you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output
Choose Gemini 4 Argon
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 7.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude Opus 4 · 19 for Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 4 Argondon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Claude Opus 4 is limited to 32,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 4 Argon support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4
Gemini 4 Argon
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30.
Gemini 4 Argon is 17 months newer than Claude Opus 4.
May 22, 2025
1.4 years ago
Sep 30, 2026
2 weeks ago
1.4yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google.
Claude Opus 4
Gemini 4 Argon
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 4 Argon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Argon.