Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro are closely matched at 36.8 and 35.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Gemini 3 Flash is 1.3x cheaper per token.
Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 36.8 and 35.6.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2-Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 3 Flash is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
Choose MiMo-V2-Pro
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
24 reported for Gemini 3 Flash · 7 for MiMo-V2-Pro
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.0).
MiMo-V2-Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) costs the same as MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.
Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 3 Flash
MiMo-V2-Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.
MiMo-V2-Pro is 3 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.
Dec 17, 2025
9 months ago
Mar 18, 2026
6 months ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.
Gemini 3 Flash
MiMo-V2-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro.