Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?

MiMo-V2-Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Gemini 3 Flash is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.0). MiMo-V2-Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

On price, Gemini 3 Flash is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.0).

MiMo-V2-Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Sun Jul 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) costs the same as MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sun Jul 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

MiMo-V2-Pro is 3 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

6 months ago

MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

3 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

MiMo-V2-Pro

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Xiaomi
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (57.1% vs 47.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.50 vs $1.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons